Man, these look great, awesome work!

Interesting concept and nice designs! One thing I would suggest is to perhaps focus more on your cross-contours, they're making the tree itself look flatter than it should be. If you captured the roundness of the cylinders, it would make the drawing have much more depth! Keep it up :)

Man, that's some nightmare fuel

Such awesome line weight on those gingers, really cool!

I found it hilarious that you show how to pronounce your name, and he goes "I'll name you Pronounce"

Hi there! Hope I can help out! I think there are several key things that aren't working, and I'll approach the box on top, and then the one on the bottom. - For the box on top, the main problem is that the box is not in 2 or 3 point perspective, since lines aren't converging anywhere. This is the reason why the box on the top and bottom look so different, perspective is being done differently. However, the "x-ray vision" concept doesn't require a 2 or 3 point perspective, and can even be done for parallel boxes in isometric view, which is the case for your box. The trick is that you have to copy the angles, and trace a line starting from the point until it's supposed to finish, and then the intersections will give you the "hidden" points! For 2 or 3 point perspective, it's the same theory, but that's better explained for the box below. - The box below is also not in 3 point perspective, as the vertical lines don't seem to converge, but you do have two vanishing points. The key problem with this is that you're guessing the angles of the bottom plane, when in fact they should be lines to the respective vanishing points. Since it's a box, all the lines will have to converge to the same points for the perspective to work. The "x-ray" vision here is established the same way, keep drawing lines from a given point to the respective vanishing point, and intersections will be your next points to trace next! Since this might seem complicated, I've color coded a "timelapse" of a box being drawn in 2 point perspective. The only difference between this and a 3 point is that the vertical lines would be converging to somewhere above the box. Here's a run-down of what I did: - trace a single line (grey) - carry the two points to the two vanishing points, resulting in 4 lines (orange) - connect the top and bottom planes to figure out the width and length of the box (blue) - carry those 4 points to the respective vanishing points, resulting in 4 lines (green). These should intersect, which gives you exactly what you need! - connect the intersecting points (purple) And those are the steps for a correct 2 point perspective!

That's the key part I'm having difficulties with! Hope Stan covers this a bit more in the critique section!

Great work! If I can give some feedback it would be to try one of these again, but this time trying to align the rotation of the cube as closely as you can to the rotation of the finger section / palm. I think that will make your hand look even cooler and closer to the reference! I added a rough sketch of what I mean next to yours. Even though I did speed run this drawing a bit, and reduced the accuracy of what I'm trying to convey, I hope you can still see a bit of what I'm talking about! Again, awesome work!

Man, those are really good. I think conforming it too much to a box is almost harder than having some flex in the boxes, great work!