Daily Sketches (Critiques are welcome)
1yr
Thieum
I create this topic to share my daily sketches (apart from assignments drawings). This will be a motivation for me to have a daily practice and to fill my sketchbooks.
Critiques are welcome.
Thank you very much!
7mo
Asked for help
Appart from the dynamic shapes studies of seals in the drawing basics course, I continued practicing on poses and portraits shapes. I tried to implement @Steve Lenze and @Martha Muniz 's advices , focusing more on accentuating movements, expressions, less on proportions and details. I tried to find interesting shapes while trying to give the impression of volume. I had a hard time sometimes, especially with the right hand of the man in the centre of the second page (which I had to modify as I never managed to draw the original postion)
Geert-Jan
7mo
Great sketches!
Show all replies (1)
7mo
Awesome job! :D
Show all replies (1)
Show 3 more replies
it looks great. I think your sketchbooks are incredible and reflect your growth.
9mo
Asked for help
A few more shapes studies from portraits and figures. I tried to simplify the shapes, sometimes to deform them more or less. Actually I most of the time go with the idea of deforming them much more but I often let myself be trapped by the temptation to simply copy the model...
9mo
I like your faces, especially laurel and Hardy.
Looking at your big face in the first one, I noticed some things that I hope can help you a little.
I did a quick sketch over that drawing, I hope it is useful :)
Show all replies (1)
9mo
I'm no instructor or anything like that I just love these sketches Especially the head It's so great to look at
Show all replies (1)
10mo
In the continuity of the exercise on animal portraits in the drawing basics course I wanted to apply this principle of research of simplified shapes on studies of a few model poses. It seems to me that it's a good way to take a little distance from the model and to take a step towards imaginative drawings... Anyway, I hope
9mo
Hello! In the spirit of moving towards more imaginative drawings, I think something that could take these studies to the next level would be emphasizing the weight carried by these poses. You seem to be getting a solid understanding of the shapes that make up the construction, and the next step could be to try and exaggerate in order for them to feel more dynamic. Focusing on an element like weight--observing the points where the weight is distributed, towards which direction their balance shifts, the tension against the ground/surface--can help guide you in this direction.
Show all replies (1)
11mo
Asked for help
A few more sketches I did from real life observation this time. Much more challenging with in particular difficulties with perspective and proportions. I Tried different techniques. Sometimes with preliminary pencil marks (more attention to composition and perspective), sometimes directly in pen (more focus directly on 2d shapes). 2 completely different exercises.
I love love the simplicity of these without a background but the perspective is a bit off in one or 2. I believe if you modify the angle of the chair legs to be more straight lines, it will ground the object. Also the shadow of the flip flops give mixed signals as to which direction is the light source. When I say this I just mean that the strap indicates the light is from above but ahead, while the shadow behind them indicates the light is directly before them instead of above. Your 1st and 4th photos are my favorite. The shelf has good perspective and the 1st is very detailed while toeing simplicity to match the others. Great work!
Show all replies (1)
11mo
These sketches are great, but I personally think that the shading is a bit bland, and the blank space the objects are "floating" in is pretty boring. I suggest you add more to the background (maybe crosshatching at the edges).
Show all replies (1)
11mo
They look really good and i really like the shading on the second page. The objects on the first page look really life like.
One thing that i noticed is that the legs on chairs sometimes go in a different perspective than they should, like the most front leg on the third page. There is also the bookcase that looks beautiful but the top row looks a bit off to me and i don't know why.
I hope that helps a bit and keep up the good work.
Show all replies (1)
Show 1 more replies
1yr
Asked for help
One more sreenshot study from the Corpse Bride in which I tried to apply @Steve Lenze 's advices about line weight and tones contrasts: more contrast on the foreground and less for middle and background. No line at all for the background. However, I probably should have pushed the contrasts even more.
Below some faces studies in which I worked on line weight, without using tones
1yr
The Corpse Bride one looks great! between the line weight and values, it really has nice depth, good job :)
Show all replies (1)
1yr
Hey Thieum,
These are cool and a great way to practice your drawing.
My suggestion is if you are going to use tone on your drawings, then you should use it to your advantage to create aerial perspective.
I did a quick sketch to show you how I would use it, I hope it helps :)
1yr
Thank you very much Steve for your feedback and your advices. Indeed my background lines are way too heavy. And next time I'l think about tones contrasts for aerial perspective. In these drawings I was sometimes disturbed by the local values of some elements that were in contradiction with the aerial perspective: some distant elements darker than some closer ones for example. I have troubles to deal with that kind of problem.
Show all replies (1)
1yr
Asked for help
2 Studies of Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio screenshots. Tried to study composition and to think about line weight (but not enough)
1yr
Very cool project that you started. I like the look at lot. What materials are you using?
Regarding line weight: The heavy lines of the foreground object in the top screenshot make it to important for my taste. Whereas the lines of the path and the house on the hill in your first landscape sketch (your other post) could be a bit thicker - in this case the aerial perspective conflicts with the central motiv.
Show all replies (1)
