Ralph
Ralph
Germany
Miguel Camilo Téllez
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Place what exactly? The jaw/chin? from what I can tell with my own limited experience, the jaw in the left one is a bit off center. Drawing a middle axis onto your sphere might help you better understand where the middle of the face would be. Also drawing the parts of the form that you do not see might help with that, especially when you are starting out. The lines that halve the sphere ends in a 90° angle to the outline of the sphere on the left for example. That however implies to the viewer, that there is actually a 90 degree angle there, rather than the round form continuing. If you look at the sphere here: https://study.com/cimages/multimages/16/sphere_cross_section7245140437775505592.jpg you can see how the cross contour lines wrap around the sphere and do not just end in a T shape when they hit the outline of the sphere. You also seem to skip the rough sketch/underdrawing for these heads. The line quality is a bit restless, because it consists of many short lines being joined together. To be perfectly honest, a lot of this implies that your grasp on 3D shapes, representing them on a 2D piece of paper and other basics is not that firm yet and I would suggest you practice that first alongside more interesting topics like drawing heads and portraits. I am not saying this to discourage you, but to save you a lot of the headache I cause myself by taking a similar approach to yours. A few years ago, I jumped in at the deeper end of the pool and basically tried to learn how to draw by taking the figure drawing class here on Proko, because it was way more interesting than the basics like drawing straight lines and geometric shapes. I had to find out the hard way however, that I lacked the basic concepts to really learn from the figure course. I learned something, sure, but certainly not as much as I could have and I did not understand why. What really helped me to get a better grasp on 3D shapes in the end, was doing the first lesson(s) on www.drawabox.com as well as their 250 Boxes challenge. (just be vary of the texture exercises in lesson 2) Maybe taking the drawing basics course here on Proko might be an even better alternative as it begins with a better understanding of 2D shapes, line quality and other basics rather than jumping directly into the more complex 3D shapes. So in summary: I would suggest that you get more practice on the basics like line quality, loose sketches/underdrawings and 3D shapes, while also practicing the more interesting topics that actually interest you (because doing only basics is boring.) Try to keep a 50:50 ration between drawings that are fun and practicing the fundamental skills. Otherwise you risk losing the joy in drawing.
Reply
Ralph
So for the earlier lessons we got warmup exercises for every concept. While I get that it is difficult to keep calling it "warm up" the more these basic exercises are combined to arrive at more complex concepts like gesture, I was wondering if there still were good warm up exercises focused on gesture? Or is that too advanced already and we should just stick to the simpler line and circle exercises for warm-ups?
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
This is about the best explanation of the subject I have ever seen/heard. Everybody else is just like "Draw gesture" and every demonstration from every artist is different which makes it that esoteric concept you have to "feel" rather than understand (Including your other gesture video to be honest.). Putting it in perspective with the explanation at the beginning that there are tons of ways to capture the same concept and then giving examples of what that concept actually is, really demystified this for me a lot. I have some catching up to do on the course since life (or rather work) has been pretty stressful lately, but I am looking very much forward to trying this myself. Thank you for sharing this.
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Lynn Fang
Try to learn the style of Jamie Hewlett, but failed. 😅 So...this is only a line practice.
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
So you studied from Jamie Hewlett by using… a photo? And you managed to produce that drawing as a result? Anatomy, changed clothing, good line weight,… and you have the nerve to call this a failure? Dude, you need some advanced class, not a beginner class…
Reply
Ralph
@Stan Prokopenko You mention that you try to understand how strokes were made, in what direction, how the drawing tool was held and such. How do we do studies of images where that is no longer clearly apparent? For example if I want to study from someone who works digitally, is that less suited to copying in an analogue medium because the techniques used might not be replicapble? So in other words: At what point does a reference become less suitable for an exercise like this? Or is there no such thing? Is it just about taking what we like and trying to replicate it in our chosen medium and then move on?
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Are there any charakteristics you would recommend for reference pictures? In this exercise we were supposed to study line quality and you chose a picture with very expressive lines that still had some sketchlines, mistakes, construction, etc. intact and even required different grips, pencil and so on. Most more "finished" drawings don't have that many clues about how they were made anymore (especially when they were done digitally). I feel like that makes them harder to study? Or maybe I just focused too much on the wrong thing during the exercise like copy everything 1:1 bit by bit rather than looking at the bigger picture to understand what does what in the image and why? I mean I did analyze what the lines did for the image and where they drew attention, became thicker and thinner and so on, but that was more of a process before and after the drawing. While I was at it it felt more like I focused on copying the final lines line for line 1:1 without thinking about the "why". Is there a remedy for this? Do certain images just lend themselves better to studying specific things? Or is it more about me and constantly reminding myself that my goal is to analyze, rather than to create a copy. For me the two won't really mix at the moment. Either I stop and think about what does what (then I could just stare at the image instead of drawing it) or I become a human copy machine. Is it just quantity and repeating such studies? Do I need to simplify the reference like you did with the shoe thumbnails? I probably miss the obvious solution at the moment so if anybody has an idea I'd appreciate a bit of help with that =/ Edit: And then the next line in the video was about using the right tool and how a regular pencil could be used to create the same look, but it wouldn't teach me about the technique used. Maybe that was a big part of the issue since I did everything with a 0.5mm marker and basically drew small shapes that I filled to vary line width… 🤔
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
ray1
Horse running by Heinrich Kley
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Am I the only one who sees a centaur leaning forward during a spring rather than a horse in both of these? The tip is the head, shoulders, arms going back, hands forming fists? I see that in both the reference and the study. Either way, good job capturing the energy of the lines. I like the darker areas in yours better actually.
Reply
Shawn Lewis
Chose John R. Neill & Bernie Wrightson. Proportions are kind of wrong on both :/
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Only slightly. You did a great job!
Reply
Meander Around
Last one is digital, critique is welcome, especially on my knives. I want to know if you guys think I executed my goals there properly or not, thanks!
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
I would suggest that you consider varying the width of your lines regardless whether they overall are thick or thin. This goes a little into what I understand about form and it is just one approach of course: almost everything we see as „lines“ are actually cast shadows caused by creases, overlaps etc. A crease on the skin is a form change on the surface of the object. Without going into too much detail, those creases are not suddenly sticking out of the skin at a 90 degree angle but rather they start small, get deeper/higher and then fade back into a surface. The shadows they cast do the same. So by drawing a line thinner on one side, thicker in the middle and the thinner at the end again, we indicate that behaviour. This gets way more complicated the more you think about it and the more you consider (like the form the shadow is cast upon is actually distorting it. In the case of the rhino, the rounded body, the position of the light, the size of the wrinkles/creases/forms we see all affect the line width and when any of these parameter changes, like a bent surface that changes the direction it faces, the line weight changes as well, etc.). Honestly it drove me insane when I got to the exercise covering this topic over at drawabox (lesson 2, texture exercise) and I have certainly not mastered it, so I won‘t go into details here. Bottom line: having your lines always be one consistent width can look constructed and mathematical. Changing the line width often looks more natural especially on organic things. (And as I said: just the way I think about it). Depending on what you are going for I am sure there are also styles that can pull of line weights that are consistent throughout
Reply
Ralph
So this is a portrait of Ellie from the Last of us 2 by Iliya Kuvshinov. I was long fascinated by his style so I thought this was a nice opportunity to take a closer look. I thought it was a good idea to trace the proportions and placement of the elements by putting a paper against my screen since I wanted to focus on the linework, which I did and it worked out alright. However, I feel like I focused too much on just 1:1 copying their line weight bit by bit after that rather than seeing a logic. Sure, where the light hits there are hardly any lines (the picture mainly uses differences in value rather than lines in these areas), where there is shadow there are more visible lines. A ton of lost lines in the light areas and in the hair too. Other than that, there is more black around the eyes (where the attention is supposed to go I guess). What is interesting is, that the rest of the face and pretty much the rest of the picture hardly has any prominent lines. There are a few but mostly in the shadow on the left side or towards the the shirt, away from the actual subject. I assume he inverted the logic and put some heavier strokes in less important areas so that the face where the light hits has hardly any heavy lines (except for the eyes) which then creates a lot of contrast around the eyes to draw the viewers focus there. Does that sound about right? I will probably do another few though since tracing the proportions from the original image felt a bit like cheating and I may have focused less on the actual studying part as a result.
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Really starting to think I am going about this wrong… Maybe I should do thumbnails like Stan did. with the shoes rather than copying 1:1 pictures. That would take away some pressure to get proportions right and also force me to understand the logic of the lines rather than focussing on getting them as identical to the original as possible. Also just using .5mm markers might be detrimental here 🤔
Reply
Ralph
Bit late to the party. Work took up a lot of time recently. First is importance, second is light. I moved the light source to the top left in the second image (and also made a mistake with the dark line on the back)
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Did a few from level 1, penguin got too big and didn't fit on the page anymore. Then moved on to level 2. Ignored some anatomy in the last two and mixed in human bits. Also all sorts of things are skewed throughout all of them.
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ron Kempke
After hearing Stan, I'm not sure this is the right course for me because I had hoped this course would provide exercises to help improve my observational accuracy. That doesn't seem to be Stan's objective and I suspect that AI is the motivating factor for his choice of topics.
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Well, everybody has different goals. As I learn more and more, I find that both, drawing from observation and imagination have a quite a big overlap in what you need to be able to do. As an example, I'd claim it is benefitial to both approaches to understand how to draw and rotate shapes in 3D space. It is hard to put into words why, but when I took a drawing class back in university they basically taught us only observational drawing. We used our pencils to measure out proportions, angles and so on to replicate what we saw on the page. The problem with that approach was however, that you could ONLY draw what you see in front of you and if even one of these measurements was slightly off your whole image got skewed because we lacked the understanding of how drawing shape in perspective works. As a result we were essentially slaves to our reference, unable to adjust anything we did not see in front of us. By understanding how to draw shapes in perspectives, mistakes like slightly wrong measurements can be corrected more easily and the whole image will look way more plastic and real than it would without this understanding. While drawing from imagination may not be everybody's goal, the techniques involved also help with improving observational drawing and will ultimately give you more freedom, even if you chose to draw from observation. I doubt that AI played that much a role in it given that the best observational drawing device is a camera and that existed for over a hundred years by now. Replicating something with 100% accuracy in a drawing may be impressive, but there are easier ways to achieve that nowadays. Of course that doesn't make it wrong to do it anyways, but you may find that it is not as impressive as it initially feels halfway through learning how to get there., What I did argue in the previous lesson was, that it is too soon for most people to start drawing from imagination at this point, because I had bad experiences with drawing classes that made such leaps in the past, but as Stan pointed out, that is what the level 1&2 system is for.
Reply
polinaagame
I had so much fun, thank you so much for this task! The yellow drawing is from imagination
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Very nice job on the simplification.
Reply
Florian Haeckh
Hey guys, I tried my hand at the level 2 assignment. My daughter wanted to get a dumbo - octopus to color it, so I settled on it. I attached a clean lineart out of habbit, but the assignment probably asked more for something in the lines of the page with the 2 designs. Hope you like it.
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Very nice results. So nice in fact that I wonder what made you chose to take this course? Your skill seems to be way beyond what is being taught here.
Reply
Mike See
Tardigrade, but kinda morphed into a caterpillar centaur.
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
Although those look nice, you pretty much seem to have ignored the instructions about using CSI lines and instead used many short scratchy lines to find the outline, then drew over those lines with a thicker line to better define which lines are "final". The result looks great and you demonstrated the ability to draw and freely move an animal from imagination, you did not however do it in the way that was demanded in the assignment (aka use only simplified CSI lines executed in one swift stroke to simplify the overall shape). I don't mean to discredit your work. You did a great job, but maybe try one more page with the technique explained in the last two videos?
Reply
Ralph
Sometimes I wonder how actual beginners with no prior background in drawing feel when they take this course and then see the kind of stuff people who are supposed to be at their level upload here…
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
If you have a regular job during the day, how do you get into a routine of drawing when you return home and are tired from your regular workday. Motivation is a myth, I know, but getting to start can still be hard. Any tips or tricks to get over that intial feeling of "I don't want to" you sometimes have before you start?
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
So I assume I can only upload something to an album by posting it here? Can I not just upload something to an album when I want to?
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Pamela Dowie
hi here is my Monster submission! thanks for the challenge!
Write reply...
Drop images here to attach them to the message
Ralph
I like that the microphone has a skull as well :D
Reply
Help!
Browse the FAQs or our more detailed Documentation. If you still need help or to contact us for any reason, drop us a line and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible!
Your name
Email
Message