Distortion vs Exaggeration – Rough Sketch Critique
This lesson has a premium version with extra content. Get it now!
127K views
lesson video
Distortion vs Exaggeration – Rough Sketch Critique
courseArt of CaricatureSelected 2 parts (131 lessons)
-25%
$203.04
$270
You save $66.96
assignments 9 submissions
Kendall Hart
Seems like Tom Petty should have been an easy one, but it wasn’t as easy as I thought.
LESSON NOTES

In this critique of Simon Helberg, Court shows the difference between distorting features and exaggerating them based on specific anatomical observations characteristic to that person. It’s a very important distinction to do caricature correctly.

Want more? There’s 10 additional critiques in the premium course.

DOWNLOADS
txt
Rough-Sketch-Critiques-Premium-transcript.txt
42 kB
mp4
Rough Sketch Critiques - Premium.mp4
2 GB
ASSIGNMENTS
Newest
Hey there! I think you ended up at a good (and really fun) resemblance. If there's anything I might suggest, I might push the length of his nose further until it's pushing down on the mouth area (if we're thinking about the face like a lump of clay with mass to distribute around) since it sticks out to me as a prominent feature and you already have the mouth region clustered low. You could also push the proximity of his eyes and eyebrows together, as even in the picture they appear grouped together in shadow as the brow bone protrudes forward.
Help!