added comment inAtompunk Robot Design Critique
3yr
Hey Presper, nice work! Beside some perspective knitpicks your overall design is solid. I did a paintover below- mostly going over the break up of our primary shapes.
But in regard to the bigger picture:
I don't think you have to better convey the concept, (in general, floating TV with arms is charming and communicated clearly here) but its more a matter of developing the concept itself. Viewers will get a notion of its common purpose, but to build intrigue we want to wonder about its purpose in terms of a story.
Of course, if you intend for a simple character then I think it's perfect.
Since you asked if it's under or over designed I think exploring that range is a sure fire way of telling. Once you see other options to compare, it's easier to know which direction to go. The idea might just evolve too- usually just taking the time to explore is what allows a design's story to develop as you go through the process!
I did a few iterations of your original, but I would take it further and see which design fits your purpose and lock onto why. If you have a certain feeling or character in mind it's much easier to know which design is appropriate. But if not, I also just love taking a design and pushing it in every direction to see which one I like best!
But again, great work! I love small floaty robot type characters- and I'd love to see the final model moving around!
Presper
3yr
Thank you so much for your input and draw over! you have given me a lot to think about!
added a new topic
Atompunk Robot Design Critique3yr
Hello! I have been working on this on and off for awhile. I would appreciate some critique! I am looking for feedback on these things.
-how is the silhouette?
-how is the color scheme?
-Is it under designed? is it over designed?
-is the perspective and structure of this concept understandable and solid?
-I plan to model and rig this in the future, is there any red flags that would make that difficult? If so, what should I do to correct it?
-Should more be added to it to better convey the concept? if so, what?
If you spot something not listed here I would love to hear it. Thank you for your critique!